https://guncadindex.com/detail/Not-A-Chiappa:7
https://guncadindex.com/detail/littlebadger1:8
Not being on Reddit is awesome :)
Franken 9 Issues Sorted Out
With Unseen Killer's help, I was able to determine that my Franken 9 problems were entirely due to using printed Sten mags. There was a different problem that affects only milsurp mags, but that's fixed in UK's latest drop. If you're using milsurp mags, print the latest frame and you should be good to go.
The problem with printed mags is that the dimensions deviate significantly from production magazine drawings. Every design I checked was wider at the feed lips and flared more steeply than specs call for. Most are also about 1mm shorter font-to-back. As a result, they won't seat deep enough to reach the mag catch or feed correctly (or at all). To be clear, there's nothing the Franken 9 can do to fix this -- the incompatibility is with the Glock slide itself.
I didn't want to print new mags just for this build, but curiosity got the best of me. I remixed a "spec-ish" version of the DMB Sten v1.1 and squirted a test print in PLA Pro. With that the Franken 9 is able to feed 100% reli
Giving up on the Franken 9
After a week on the struggle bus, I think I'm going to throw in the towel on the Franken 9. I love the concept and there are some really clever design elements. The problem is that I just can't see how to get standard printed Sten mags to work reliably. With a modified mag catch, I was able to get my build to accept a printed DMB Sten mag and feed dummy rounds. But it's hard to get the mag to lock in (because it has to be held right up against the bottom of the slide) and it's very easy to induce a failure just by bumping the mag.
The fundamental problem seems to be that printed Sten mags present the rounds about 0.8mm lower than Glock mags. That means the feed protrusion on the slide just barely catches the rim of cartridge in the magazine. It can work, but there's no margin. Mag fit relative to the slide has to be absolutely perfect. It might work better with surplus magazines (I don't have any to test). It also wouldn't be too hard to remix the printed mags to be a little more comp
Range Day with the Urutau
My Urutau was a big hit at the range today. ROs and shooters alike were all very interested in the build and how it performed. I've been slowly working to get the firing pin length dialed in and I think I'm finally getting close. I didn't run a lot of rounds, but it ran the two 20-round factory CZ mags and the two 30-round ETS mags I brought without a single failure. Some slow-fire, some doubles, some Bill-drills. I even ran the last 30 rounds with a 3D printed can (OKB-69 Khrizantzema). Note that this is with a remixed lower receiver since the ETS mags do not properly fit the lower in the official release. If I have another successful range session with this lower, I'll release it.
Unless you need extremely high impact strength, there's little reason to choose PA6-CF over PPA-CF. If you do need extremely high impact strength, then you want PA6-CF to absorb moisture because that's what contributes to it.
There's this perception that moisture absorption is some kind of continuous and unending process that eventually turns PA6 into goo. That's not true. Without immersion, PA6-CF is going to max out at around 5% moisture content. At that point it's still 3 times stiffer than PETG.