That’s not the message here at all.

It’s the downstream effects of your message that I’m worried about. We shouldn’t get sloppy with nuclear material. Suggesting that a little radiation exposure isn’t bad or a little water contamination isn’t bad, while perhaps technically correct, can lead to sloppiness and eroding standards. People should be afraid of radiation so they respect it.

Perhaps this is true, however it’s a slippery slope. “Don’t mind my leaky reactor. If anything it’s good for you, a little bit of extra radiation reduces your risk of cancer.”

Honestly OP this is such a weird message to be pushing. Are you heavily invested in nuclear or something?

Would that have any result? Couldn’t the US, being on the security council, simply veto whatever resolution was put forward?