Europe is moving decisively away from U.S. tech giants toward open-source alternatives, driven by concerns over digital sovereignty and reliability of American companies[1]. At the 2025 OpenInfra Summit Europe, industry leaders emphasized that this shift isn’t about isolation but resilience.

“What we’re really looking for is resilience. What we want for our countries, for our companies, for ourselves, is resilience in the face of unforeseen events in a fast-changing world. Open source allows us to be sovereign without being isolated,” said OpenInfra Foundation general manager Thierry Carrez[1:1].

This transition is already happening. The German state Schleswig-Holstein has replaced Microsoft Exchange and Outlook with open-source email solutions. Similar moves have been made by the Austrian military, Danish government organizations, and the French city of Lyon[1:2].

European companies are stepping up to fill the gap with open-source alternatives, including:

  • Deutsche Telekom’s Open Telekom Cloud
  • OVHcloud’s sovereign cloud services
  • STACKIT and VanillaCore’s European-based offerings[1:3]

The movement gained additional momentum when the European Commission appointed its first executive vice president for tech sovereignty, security, and democracy in 2024[1:4].


  1. ZDNet - Europe’s plan to ditch US tech giants is built on open source - and it’s gaining steam ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎

    • Ardens@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      5 days ago

      Agreed… And they will. They will want functions that are stable and works… They can easily put some funds into that…

    • Matty Roses@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      Bingo. Even just a small amount of what they were previously paying the US tech firms would mean huge advancements.

    • jlow (he / him)@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m pretty sure the reason why this won’t be happening is (as always): it doesn’t make the rich richer and it doesn’t have immediate benefits you can point to for your reelection.

    • Ferk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I wonder if resurrecting Firefox OS might still be an option. It was such an interesting idea having the webapps be first citizens.

      There’s the KaiOS fork, but the direction is not really the same since it’s more targeted to low power keypad-based phones… and I believe they replaced much of the Gonk layer with a very stripped down low level Android base which isnt fully open source… maybe if they coordinated with the LibrePhone project and some hw manufacturers (like EU-based Nokia) we’d get a fully free stack.

      • B0rax@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        It was such an interesting idea having the webapps be first citizens.

        Wasn’t that also the idea with the first iPhone and iOS1 until they realized the potential of native apps?

        • Ferk@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Did they work on developing new web standards to unlock that potential on the web?

          Back then HTMLv5 wasn’t even a thing, there was no concept of video/microphone/gyroscope/gps access for webapps, notifications, web workers, web sockets, offline PWA webapps, etc. It was not a viable idea unless they actually were to invest big. They weren’t so committed. In Firefox OS even the dialer was a webapp, Mozilla brought forth a lot of innovative APIs to make it possible, many of which are in use today even after the OS was discontinued. And nowadays you even have things like Webassembly that allows you to code it in C or whatever low level language you want.

          I feel Apple has always been more interested in their own ecosystem. Opening the web to have the same level of potential as the native apps from their walled garden goes against that strategy, so I don’t believe they were really serious about that approach, it’s always been more interesting for them to prioritize their native apps.

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    Open source is the only realistic way forward for Europe, since reimplementing popular US platforms from scratch would be a herculean effort. Hopefully there will be a lot more funding and polish for popular projects as a result. Maybe Europe will get serious about using Linux instead of Windows finally.

    • Zerush@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      Clearly it isn’t easy to switch away from US corporative services and the way to go is OpenSource and if not, using instead EU products and services. It’s still a long way to go, the way is made walking. It’s about souvereignity, not depending on greedy US companies, less with this stupid Australopithecus as President. Time to show him the middlefinger, as at least Spain already does.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah, it’s going to be a long process realistically, and hopefully there’s actual sustained state level commitment to getting that done from the European countries. Frankly, it should’ve been obvious why it’s a bad idea to become so dependent on foreign tech, but better late than never.

  • vogo13@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Yeah Canadians are so serious about boycotting the US, except everyone still uses Mastercard, Visa, Android, Google, AWS, Microsoft, Linkedin, Indeed, FB, IG, etc. etc. They can’t even press the free delete account button, what a great boycott! Finally after almost a year only the EU is just beginning to discuss digital sovereignty.

    • BenjiRenji@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 days ago

      Well, you can’t expect the whole net of dependency to be torn down that quickly when it took decades to be established. Especially if you want a somewhat normal life.

      Even before the latest acceleration into fascism I kept looking for alternatives of almost everything I use and the pain is something I’ve just got used to when it started with switching to Linux only over 20 years ago. Of course I still get envious when iPhone users just quickly AirDrop some pics, so I get why it’s not always easy to switch to alternatives.

      But alternatives exist. Exploring them has become a lot more mainstream and they get more funding and support.

    • bravemonkey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      What do Canadians have to do with European tech sovereignty? Why are you trying to hijack this thread?

      And for Canadians, what realistic alternatives are you suggesting for everything you’ve listed?

      If you want to be taken seriously, start by proposing an actionable plan.

    • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I don’t use Android, Google, Linkedin, Indeed, or FB, and I don’t even know what IG is. I didn’t bother to close the accounts. Canada has no credit card yet. I paid for MS software before US GOP went nuts.

  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Thierry Carrez commented, “Did you notice what I didn’t talk about in my keynote? I made no mention of AI.”

    The world needs sovereign, high-performance and sustainable infrastructure," continued Carrez, "that remains interoperable and secure, while collaborating tightly with AI, containers and trusted execution environments.

    He was so close to greatness :(

    • Zerush@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Well, respect AI, there is a big one from Swiss, Apertus with its PublicAI, using the Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CSCS), also used by the CERN. All 100%FOSS and privacy centred. I currently use the PublicAI in my bookmarks (free account (nick,mail). The Apertus dataset can also be downloaded if someone want to selfhost it (~90 GB min)

  • highduc@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    After so many decades of being reliant on US proprietary tech, now they’re moving away to foss?!

    Sounds excellent but I’ll remain reluctant until I see wide scale adoption.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I mean yeah. Trump could tomorrow make some idiotic statement about tariffs on American cloud services like aws. Seriously, who would be surprised?

    Before Trump, nobody would even suggest to distance themselves from the USA. Now, everyone is thinking it.

    Great job I guess, if you want a planet where countries are fighting eachother instead of working together. But Trump mentality is that he must be the winner, always. He cant understand that sometimes another country being winner also helps his own. He must be the winner.

    He is the typical guy in the sandbox that takes the entire sandbox because its all about him.

    • Luke@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 days ago

      Your comments are not wrong, but also Trump is not the sole issue here. There would still be a problem even if he was removed from office today.

      Proprietary software and services are an issue regardless of which government jurisdiction they fall under. It’s a good idea for the EU to be moving to open source instead of proprietary solutions based in the EU.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yeah 100%. I just dont know if Europe can compete. There is no real European cloud with hundreds of services, and Linux in the enterprise world is much harder to administer than windows. Microsoft is good at selling their enterprise stuff.

        I think all of that is going to put Europe behind. But maybe its good to get started. Perhaps that will actually lead to an entire market for making Linux as good as windows in the enterprise.

    • Matty Roses@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s not just Trump - there’s a reason that Russia, Cuba, China, and North Korea have made moves to adopt Linux. The US has been seeking to weaponize their tech standards for a while, especially as their empire crumbles.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I think it wont crumble during our livetime. But the debt is going make dollars worth less and less. Perhaps they switch to bitcoin… :)

        • Matty Roses@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I think it will be sooner than people expect. For at least 9 years now the US has not only been crumbling, but flailing as it does so. The ability of BRICs to shrug off the US actions is new and will have massive impacts soon.

          BTC won’t be used as a currency IMHO. Blockchain likely will, but EVM is much more compelling. BTC might remain as a historical backing, but its trade will move to the ETH chains as well.

          • 1984@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Sounds like everyone should buy a bit of blockchain and crypto stock market stuff… Just in case it takes over…:)

  • brax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s almost mind-blowing how people still rely on Azure, Windows, and MS Office for really sensitive shit. Like, MS might as well be an arm of the US Government if they aren’t already. All the foreign governments storing sensitive shit in Azure servers is just fucking wild to me. So what if the data centres are stored outside of the USA? The parent company is still the parent company.

  • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 days ago

    It seems like backend companies are ready for this, but today, what are the options for individual end users looking to escape google etc? Proton has a package with mail, storage, etc, murena for phones, nextcloud, opencloud, suite numerique, is the industry converging on any standards here like .odt for documents but for other standards and protocols?

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      While I wish there was an Open Source client, I can only imagine why Valve does not want that. First, it would help fakers and scammers too. Steam has a Scammer problem. Secondly, it could help the competition. At least an official API would go a long way, to enable the community to write their own Open Source client based on the API.

      • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Valve doesn’t mind allowing the competition to use some of their more critical contributions such as Proton (and SteamOS code outside of the store/client launcher), so I don’t consider their situation problematic at all. Heck, competition (such as GOG) can have their users take advantage constantly by having their games load through Proton.

        • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Proton builds and is based on bunch of Open Source software such as WINE. Valve cannot, even if they wanted to, make it closed source. The Steam client itself is closed source, so this is a decision Valve can make.

          • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            The OpenXR standard (created entirely by Valve and HTC) is open to everyone, alongside their SteamOS work for the Steam Deck (with the sole exception of the steam client).

            Yes, it is a decision that they can make, but I personally don’t consider it unreasonable or irrational. They allow almost all of the other fruits of their labor to be used, and have no problems with things like fan derivative works.

            • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              The thing is, Valve wouldn’t even need to open source the client. If there was an official programming interface as an API to connect to (with online checks to verify off course), then people could build their own clients. The cool thing would be, only features they want to have and with the GUI toolkits and interface the way they want it could be possible. Totally open source too, at least on the client part. Maybe the official API and client could only do some stuff, not everything; in example selling or trading items or buying games would be not possible, but stuff like starting a game. This alone would be awesome.

        • Zerush@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I like sarcasm, but if you don’t know the people, it’s not always clear that it was in this sense. With eg. the PP of Google there are no doubts with: Your privacy is very important for us.

  • Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I don’t begrudge Europe for doing this and they should absolutely keep going this direction but they are going to start sucking even more out of US users. Maybe it will help us move forward.

    • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      The good thing about open source is that it’s open, so hopefully it will benefit everyone. Of course, hosting always cost money, but the tech itself isn’t locking you in.

      • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Right! Truly a rising tide kind of tech. When Facebook fully shifts from enshittification to fully enfuckified if more of the world is already on FOSS alts and supporting the software ecosystem people will have a meaningful alternative to jump to.

      • I assumed they were saying the companies need specific amounts of revenue to cover their debts and if they lose foreign revenue streams, they’re going to make it up by increasing domestic prices.

        • Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yes, this is what I meant.

          Or just they make this much money so to continue making this amount they have to up prices somehow.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        they are going to start sucking even more out of US users even more

        :|

        Maybe that EU kept MS&co in check?
        That’s not how I see it, but there was some minimal resistance.

        Anyways, open sauce means tech giants are gonna illegally yoink the code, but slap some profit margins on (besides support that is).
        That does sux the even more out of users.

        • Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          They didn’t necessarily keep them in check, but maybe kept growth slower Initially. However this is not my area, so take it with as much salt as you’d like.