• AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    15 days ago

    The alternative is having an exemption for religious texts. If the Bible was judged by the standards of secular literature, it would not be made available to children.

    • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      The alternative is having an exemption for religious texts.

      People would protest this by claiming 50 shades is their religious text or something

  • fodor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    14 days ago

    My god, have you read Genesis? There’s some sick shit going on, drugging people to have sex with them… That kind of conversation damn well wouldn’t fly at my workplace.

  • mormund@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 days ago

    While these text obviously depict violence in a plethora of ways, it once again shows how flawed “NSFW” is as a catch all label. As a priest the bible is obviously safe for work. For a sex worker porn and sex toys are safe for work, etc. We as society should learn to use more useful content warnings everywhere.

  • wheezy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    This is an insult to erotic literature. The Bible has an automatic censor built in. It’s boring as fuck to actually read it. No one reads that shit.