• AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      What are you talking about? There’s one Korea and half of it is occupied by an imperialist army.

      Am I on .world? Why are people downvoting objective reality?

      • Ardens@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Oh, so they share their passport, their borders, their economy and so forth? Do you also believe that all countries that speak English, is the UK? or US?

        • SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          You can accept or reject the claim that South Korea is an imperialist outpost of the US. I don’t care about that right now.

          But you do know that nothing in OPs comment implies that the two korea’s share passports or anything like that, right? Like, come on, these are basic reading comprehension skills.

          • Ardens@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            And you simply don’t get the point, that there are two “Korea” and that it would be prudent to say which one you are talking about. That’s beyond your basic comprehension skills.

        • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Why do I have to put up with this kind of feigned ignorance after being made to look at maps that include Crimea in Ukraine for like a decade now?

  • DigitalDilemma@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    8 days ago

    As a sysadmin that’s pretty much my worst nightmare. I really feel for those trying to pick the pieces back up again after that.

    • TheOakTree@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      You know for a fact that the people doing the largest share of the recovery effort have nothing to do with the decision to have no backups.

      …but with the way social/work hierarchies work in SK, it was probably never brought up.

      • DigitalDilemma@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        You know for a fact that the people doing the largest share of the recovery effort have nothing to do with the decision to have no backups.

        Exactly. How they got there is no consolation to those dealing with it now.

  • morto@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 days ago

    Hmm a system that stored government documents caught fire and they have no backups? Hmm, this carries the same energy of registry offices catching fire “spontaneously” in the past.

  • Majestic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 days ago

    Perhaps contained evidence against the former PM who tried to do a military coup and this is the way of getting rid of it? Perhaps protecting co-conspirators if not the top guy.

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Korean government’s

    South.

    (Just in case anybody else isn’t a clairvoyant either)

  • Anna@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yeah who needs proper DR. it’s not like disasters ever happen.

  • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    Always have two backups in different places than the original. If not, the least you can do is have one backup copy. How does the government don’t have such thing?

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I have one backup but keep legacy things so that in a massive disaster I still have archives that have some of my important long term type documents. So figure one up to date backup and in a disaster I have stuff from last year.

      • Corridor8031@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        sounds like you are suggesting that in private companys jobs are distributed by merit and skills lol

        • unexpected
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          No.

          But it does give more options to work around or not support those entities since they don’t have as much direct authority.

      • smh@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        Ooh, ooh! I’m in that law! I’m in the (to paraphrase) “competent and devoted to the goal but unempowered” group!

  • Kissaki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    Too slow storage to back up? What a stupid, false reason. I assume nobody works at night. Do something else than full backups and you at least have something. A simple differential update replication would have saved them here.

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Or do it by priority. Files that change often or are very important are copied fully often, maybe daily. A differential update of all files could follow daily or who knows weekly. Its the government, they should have money to add more storage, so that shouldn’t be the problem. At least some strategy to manage slow speed, instead not having ANY backup its the dumbest thing I’ve read from governments in a while.