Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
Posts
2
Comments
36
Joined
4 mo. ago

  • Not sure on the difference, but I’d look at the rerelease files for building as they’ve made some changes

  • Just a thought, and don’t know the legality or potential liability of this, but maybe adding something in the wiki about what to say and pictures to add in the section about materials on the form 1 for 3DP suppressors may be helpful for many. Again just a thought! Thanks for posting this as I’m sure many will find this useful!

  • Honestly, I have a tf-1913 from PSA on mine. Works for what I need.

  • Different brace for chortex and now that you’ll have a spare brace laying around… start another build….

  • I adjusted support top z distance to .265 and bottom z to .225 and have found these make removing supports a little easier without ruining print quality

  • Chortex and pick a stock or brace

  • Agreed. Like I said, if it goes the way I hope it does, it sets a precedent for the rest of their SS suits and would make the design off limits for them to chase. As they have no claim to the design.

  • Yep! Hoping this doesn’t go well for RG and sinks all of their other suits against all the SS mfgs out there that they’re trying to sue as well. Would love to see them get absolutely shit on over this.

  • Shameful. It’s too late either way for Rare Greed. The files are already out there and have been for a few years. Truthfully there is no money to be made on their part, so what are they actually suing for? I think we’ve found the next company that wants to be like Q and KB.

  • Preciate it!

  • A pair of them surprisingly

  • How much fitting was needed to get the RIA parts to work together properly? I want to do this build, but want to ensure it’s not past my abilities first.

  • .265 is the number I also landed on after testing a number of different support distances. It’s enough to create easy separation of supports but not have a spaghetti monster on the underside of the print. For most, changing this setting is easier than what you described below. I was printing a Plasticatto in Elegoo PAHT and had major issues removing supports at .16 so I did some testing and landed at the .265. Happens to work well with other PAs as well as PPA—CF and GF. Just my experience though

  • You could reach out to Mostly Peaceful Machine Shop and ask him. I believe this is his design

  • I’ve heard good things about the pill popper v2

  • Happened to me as well. For saying google my username lol.

  • Well, that sucks. Wish I had known these were up in the first place. I’m trying to measure the LCI location to make a plug, but I don’t have a slide here to measure on.

  • 300 is a 7.62 round in a necked down 5.56 case…. So yeah, gonna feel similar. As was previously stated, it was designed to shoot out of the same rifle as 5.56 with just a barrel change.

  • Much appreciated!

  • File Drops @forum.guncadindex.com

    Plasticatto mag extension

    Created a +2 mag extension for my plasticatto build. This is a 31mm ish extension with a large baseplate to limit it to +2 rounds. I limited it here because I know the factory Glock mag springs will work with this.

    This should fit all factory Glock 17/34 mags.

    These are available on my Makerworld profile along with a few other accessories that might suit your needs.

    https://makerworld.com/en/@Sparrow0914

  • Show Off Your Builds @forum.guncadindex.com

    PAHT-CF plasticatto

    All finished up, minus the optic which I will be ordering tomorrow!